Transparency Notice Re: Amendment #7

By giovanni.gen @ 2024-10-04 05:15:00

For the sake of transparency, we must highlight the fact that the previous ruling for the original rule was made under strong bias for the ROM hack category.

The way the rule was enforced could have posed harsh consequences against open-source entries, which would impose strict moderation towards commits made to publicly available repositories as "updates".

Had the ruling been rejected, a multitude of ROM Hacks would have been disqualified, under the assumption that the strictest moderation was applied. Examples of entries specifically affected by these circumstances include:

  • Sonic ERaZor 7
  • Sonic 1 Mega CD Port

We'd like to note that Sonic 1: South Island Expedition was also potentially subject to disqualification under this rule, due to an accidental, very minor post-deadline update that was pushed without the knowledge of even the developers.

The verdict nullifying Rule 7 was pushed prematurely, with insufficient review from the 3D and Modern 2D Judges. The incident was internally reviewed, the verdict was subsequently approved, and internal measures will be put in place to prevent future occurrences of similar incidents.

 
Selbi @ 2024-10-04 08:06:43

For extra transparency, the fix in question for ERaZor was for a potential wallclip in the final stage (which was discovered and reported by an SHC judge... it's like fate istg).

Inferno @ 2024-10-04 10:02:08

At least it wasn't 'GitHub decides to revert the reversion of a layout change in a non-primary level that was just a few springs being moved ever so slightly and it is only found out later when people are taught about HASH differences'.

MDTravis @ 2024-10-04 10:18:49

I'm the one that discovered all of this originally. That commit did indeed start it, but it was also an entire branch in the source code that was updated weeks after the deadline that implemented widescreen support.

Inferno @ 2024-10-04 10:24:18

Comment deleted by Inferno @ 2024-10-04 10:39:12